In my upcoming debate, how can i rebutt against someone saying BUSHFIRES KILL ANIMALS?
Favorite Answer
1) Explain how bushfires don’t kill very many animals (find statistics or whatever)
2) Bushfires are IMPORTANT. Tons of people have written on how bushfires help stabilize land and help with soil enrichment. Explain how without bushfires, way more animals would die of starvation from overworked soil/crops than the few animals that die during the bushfires.
3) As a last resort, argue that bushfires kill enough animals to stabilize the population. Without bushfires, certain species would overpopulate the earth, and exhaust food and other resources, which would have extremely detrimental effects on the entire ecosystems.
Good luck in your debate! Hope this helps!
When yellowstone had a Wildfire scientist were amaze how bears and other wildlife prefer areas that were burned. New trees to grow and the soil is more fertile. That is why there are now prescribed fires.
Prescribed fires help the land by burning old and decompose plants and trees to make way for the new trees and plant life.
Did you try smokey the bear website there are good info there… GOOD LUCK!!!!
And hope they bring up something truly debatable.