Who’s “they”??
but who’s they?
good luck working this out
and no i didn’t just hear this i’ve been thinking about it since i was 10.
Favorite Answer
This is just one grammatical solution to the problem of how to talk about some action or event taking place WITHOUT focusing on or being concerned about just who it is that did it (the “agent”).
English has two ways to do this
(a) use of the “impersonal” pronoun with an active verb form:
* They say she’s pretty.
* You can never be sure. (this ‘you’ does not have to mean, or be restricted to, the one spoken to)
* One can never be to careful.
(b) passive voice
* It is said (that) . . . .
* She was side-swiped (by. . . ).
Note that SOME things can be communicated in either of these forms, some not. (Try to convert the second and third examples in (a) above into passive voice, and you’ll see what I mean!) But even when you can use both forms, there tends to be a slight difference in meaning, or at least emphasis. Also, there is a tendency to try to AVOID using the passive in English.
“They” are the ones who complain about the leadership, and “their” opinion is always conveniently communicated to someone… confidentially, of course, for the “benefit of all”.
“They” sayers are always liars!
It’s “their” opinion that count, and it’s “their” approval or not.
i’m bullshitting you. i have no clue! =)
just like when people say “stick it to the man”
who is that guy anyway?
g’day!
If it is useless information, then the word “They” refers to the people at Fox news.