help! those who are good in science?

1. scanning power

2. because it can push into the glass and crack the slide.

4. alway carry the scope by the arm with a hand under the base, and always be sure to put the objectives back to scanning power when putting away the scope. Also clean any emersion oil off the stage and objective with lens paper.

1. Not entirely sure what this means…I think the answer is use the weakest objective to scan a specimen before zooming in because it’s easier to focus and easier to determine what you’re looking at.

2. The coarse adjustment knob moves the platform too quickly for the highest power objective. It makes it very difficult to focus and may cause you to contact the slide with the lens.

3. Magnifying power is how large you can make an object. In other words, it’s how much you can zoom in on the microscope slide. Resolving power is essentially the ability to distinguish between two points. For example, light microscopes are limited by the resolving power of light; they can only zoom in so far before the image becomes irrevocably blurry. To get more detail at higher magnifications, one must use an electron microscope which has much greater resolving power (due to the wavelength of electrons).

4. Always carry it by the neck. Clean the highest magnification lens when used with oil. etc…See above.

gah! i’m so ill of this comparable question. burden of information is on you to tutor there’s a god, why do you have self belief technological understanding proves there is no such element as witches? as for ben stein’s action picture it incredibly is a thoroughly shameless propaganda piece, dawkins replaced into actual attempting to help stein by using offering I.D it is superb shot, which particularly isn’t asserting plenty because of the fact even dawkins himself says that could be a incredibly susceptible argument, that is in basic terms the excellent olive branch he could desire to grant stein. and then stein shamelessly twists his words. there is no information of an sensible fashion designer that is not technological understanding. it did not bypass peer overview and once you tried to cheat and wade by using to courts (to get judges to tell scientists a thank you to do technological understanding) they nevertheless sided with us and you get carry of slaughtered.