What’s the difference between flammable and Inflammable?
Favorite Answer
However, “inflammable” can also be used in two other ways:
– You can use it to describe a person with an emotional disposition who is quick to anger.
– You can also use “inflammable” as a noun, to describe the thing that possesses the “flammable” quality. For example, a container of gasoline could be called “an inflammable”, but could not be called “a flammable”.
The two aren’t oxymorons. An oxymoron is a single concept, such as “jumbo shrimp” or “deafening silence” that contradicts itself. “Inflammable” doesn’t internally contradict itself, because you have to know the definition of the word to see any unusual effects.
AlsoI think the word “inflammable” is perfectly fine according to the rules of the English language. Although the prefix “in” can mean “not”, such as with the word “inaccurate” or “incomplete”, the prefix “in” can also mean “possessing the quality of”. Examples are: “invaluable” – possessing the quality of being valuable, and “inflammable” – possessing the quality of being flammable.
Inflammable means that the object cannot be used as fuel but can still be oxidised by means of combustion e.g. Iron.
An oxymoron is a phrase that contradicts itself e.g. “deafening silence”, “blackening light” and “Falsely true”.
1. able to catch fire: readily capable of catching fire
INFLAMMABLE
1. easily set on fire: quickly and easily set on fire and burned
2. easily roused: easily made angry or passionate
3. flammable item: something that is quickly and easily set on fire and burned
No i dont think they are oxymorons. Oxymorons are expressions with contradictory words: a phrase in which two words of contradictory meaning are used together for special effect, for example, “wise fool” or “legal murder.